What is Quantum Physics?

By Jim Tucek

 

 

"I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics." -  Richard P. Feynman

 

Does the thought of quantum physics send a chill down your spine, just like the words calculus, differential equations, and -gasp- organic chemistry? You may not even think that quantum physics is a serious science, like the more familiar Newtonian physics. Just relax! I'm sure you're comfortable with regular physics, which describes the way that matter interacts with other matter, i.e. gravity, velocity, etc. Quantum physics is just the physics of the incredibly small. While Newtonian physics can suitably describe the orbit of the planets or the energy transformations during a game of pool, quantum physics describes how electrons surround the nucleus of the atom and other subatomic actions.

 

At this point, you may be thinking that there's not that big of a difference between these two sciences. Hey, both explain how matter interacts with other matter, so what's the big deal? The difference is that the common laws of physics begin to deteriorate on small scales. For example, Nippendenso (Japan Electric) built a car that's only half a millimeters long. One could easily mistake it for a grain of rice if not for its gold color. At the scale of 1 to 1000, physics is already changing. Oil would now gum up the engine, and the tires wouldn't have enough traction to move the car.

 

Quantum physics tries to explain the behavior of even smaller particles. These particles are things like electrons, protons, and neutrons. Quantum physics even describes the particles which make these particles! That's right; the model of an atom that you were taught in high-school is wrong. The electrons don't orbit like planets; they form blurred clouds of probabilities around the nucleus. Protons and neutrons? They're each made of three quarks, each with its own 'flavor' and one of three 'colors'. Lets not forget the gluons, the even smaller particles that hold this mess together when they collect and form glueballs (not a very original name). Why weren't you told about this already? Were you fluent in calculus when you took general chemistry? The quantum model of the atom is much more complex than the traditional model, so most teachers save that stuff for college. (But this doesn't mean that you can't have a basic understanding and impress your friends!) The reason that quantum physics needs complex math to explain the behaviors and properties of small particles is that the world of these subatomic particles is a very bizarre one, filled with quantum probabilities and organized chaos. For example, the exact position and velocity of an electron is very hard to find because attempts to "see" it involve bouncing other particles off of it. By doing this, you've just changed the electron's velocity, so your data is useless. What quantum physics does is give us the statistical probability of the electron's location at any one moment. By learning how these particles act, scientists can better understand the matter which makes up the universe, and the way it behaves (or misbehaves). Quantum physics even plays a part in blackholes, where regular physics is thrown out the window and then some!

The Origins of Quantum Physics

 

The roots of quantum physics reach far into the past. Even Isaac Newton, the father of classical physics, played a part in the development of quantum physics. He didn't know it at the time, but one of his most famous arguments was a matter of Quantum physics. Newton tried to explain the behavior of light in terms of particles, which he called corpuscles. He was the

founder of the physics of particles after all, so why shouldn't light be treated like particles, just like the planets. The Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens, however, tried to describe light in the terms of waves. Although the wave and particle theories of light were both sound, there was one obvious problem with Huygens' wave theory: when light is obstructed, it creates a shadow with well-defined edges. If light was a wave traveling through Huygens' "ether", it would flow around the edges of the obstruction, blurring the shadow. (This is not the case because the wavelength of light is small enough to create sharp edges, but this was not considered at the time.) Because of this flaw, and the fact that Newton was the physics hotshot of his day, the particle theory was accepted. With quantum physics, though, both of these theories are right.

 

The wave theory did not come up again until an English scientist named Thomas Young devised an interesting experiment to test it. This experiment, which is explained under Important Experiments, proved Newton's particle theory of light to be wrong. The experiment was ignored by most scientists because of Newton's greatness. Augustin Fresnel, a Frenchman, however, adopted this idea and worked to create a wave explanation of light. His work also included explaining why a thin film of oil creates such a colorful reflection. He noticed that a film of oil is bumpy and uneven, so it reflects the light at different angles. He theorized that if color was a product of the wavelength of light, and since waves can mix in ways to either strengthen or dampen the product's wavelength, the colors produced must be a product of the light bouncing off the uneven surface and interfering with the other reflected light waves. If light was made up of particles, it couldn't do this. By the nineteenth century, it had become accepted that light was made of waves.

 

Important Experiments

 

Thomas Young's experiment consisted of a light source shining on a obstacle with a small slit in it. If a wave hits such a slit, it spreads out the way shown. The next two slits on the next obstacle create two more such waves, which are close enough to interfere with each other. If light truly was a wave, then this interference would either increase or decrease the intensity of the light when it hit the screen.


If light were just a particle, and you were able to send just one photon through, then there would be no pattern on the screen, just a single point of light. However, it has been found that even if just one photon is sent through, it creates the same interference pattern, although dimmer. If the light is measured, or observed, in between the screen and the second barrier, no interference pattern is formed. Instead, there is the most intense light in between the two slits, which gets dimmer as it

progresses away.

 

This phenomenon is one of the basic principles of quantum physics, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. If light is not being observed, it acts as a wave, but if it is being observed, it has to behave itself and act like particles. Thomson's experiment with cathode ray tubes which allowed him to discover electrons was rather simple. He took a cathode ray tube, or a glass tube with very little gas left inside of it, and sent a current through it. As expected, it created a glow from one electrode to the other. Next, Thomson took a magnet, which deflects the flow of electrons (called cathode rays), and put it next to the cathode ray tube. This deflected the beam slightly. He realized that the cathode rays were being deflected by the negative end of the magnet, so the cathode rays must be negatively charged. Because of the flow of electricity through the tube, these negative particles were being knocked off the atoms in the gas. This led him to name them electrons, which (to him) where negatively charged particles embedded in a sphere of positive charge, which made up the atom.

 

Rutherford's experiment with alpha particles (which are positive) and gold foil led to the discovery of the protons. In this experiment, he used a piece of radioactive material as a source of alpha-particles. Today, a particle accelerator would also do the job. He used lead shielding to aim the alpha particles towards a thin sheet of gold film. Around the gold film was a series of detectors, which emitted a small flash of light when hit by an alpha-particle. In a very dark room, Rutherford and his colleges recorded the flashes and their locations. The majority of the alpha particles passed through the gold foil but some were deflected. The shock came when they found that some were deflected back at the source. From the statistics gathered, Rutherford theorized that atoms were made up of a cloud of electrons surrounding a very small positive nucleus, which was what the positive alpha particles were being deflected by.

 

You may be wondering how quantum physics applies to the real world. How can anything so small be of any use to us? What about data storage and processors? The smaller and denser they get, the better they are. And the way things are headed in the computer hardware industry, in another twenty years these computer components will be so small and densely packed together that quantum physics will actually be a major factor. Still not impressed? Do you want some big discovery in the

laboratory which prompts a loudly exclaimed "Eureka!" Quantum physics can do that too.  


In 1995, a team of Colorado scientists managed to cool atoms enough to make them into a Bose-Einstein Condensate. No, this is not some sort of new ice-cream flavor. This state is created when the wavelength of the atoms get large enough to overlap, creating a mass of thousands of atoms which act like one. Another way to look at it is that as the atoms get colder and thus slower, their velocity gets easier to obtain. You could pretty much say that they had none. The
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle says that the more you know about the velocity of an electron (or photon), the less you can know about its location, and vise versa. As the velocity gets easier to find, the position of the electron gets "fuzzy". If the Gateway Arch were under these same conditions somehow, it's position would be in downtown St. Louis, give or take a hundred miles. Because of this give-or-take position, the electrons get "fuzzy" enough to overlap into one big blob.

The Bose-Einstein Condensate has some very unique properties. Recently, Danish physicist Lene Vestergaard Hau and her colleagues made a condensate and sent a beam of light through it. Nanoseconds later the beam of light had left the other side, although nearly 90% weaker. It's no big deal that it was weaker. It's just like a really good pair of sunglasses. The real surprise comes from the fact that the beam of light should have come out even faster. The light took its time getting through the condensate (relatively speaking). The computed speed of the light through the condensate was a mere thirty-eight miles-per-hour. I've gone faster than that, although not through a Bose-Einstein Condensate. At that speed, it would take light nearly three centuries to reach the Earth from the sun, instead of the traditional eight minutes. That's really slow for light! The researchers predict that they will soon be able to slow light to a sluggish speed somewhere under ten miles-per-hour.

This discovery actually has some useful applications. Because light travels extremely fast under normal circumstances, it makes an efficient way of moving data, as it does through fiber-optic cables. The idea of a computer that mostly relies on light instead of electrons to move data to and from the processor, etc. has the advantage that it would be extremely fast in its calculations. The speed which would make calculations rival any super computer also makes a very tricky way of storing the data as light. A Bose-Einstein Condensate could slow light enough to put it in storage, much like a hard-drive. Although a Bose-Einstein Condensate at home is a bit unreasonable today, it may not sound like such a bad idea a few decades from now.

 

"Anyone who is not shocked by the quantum theory has not understood it."    -   Niels Bohr